Queen for a Day

Last night, a well known comic book creator posted an image of a woman in a sexy batman costume with a comment about how they would like to “input” themselves into her. I took offense, and shot back a snide response to the image’s comment. The tweet was immediately deleted. I was shocked and delighted. The fact that a creator as popular as this one would listen to a single fan on something like this is something I would have never expected. This is a creator I have always had some measure of respect for, and this instance only deepened that admiration.

Less than a minute later this was tweeted:



Anyone that doesn’t see what is wrong with this question needs to Google “rape culture.”

I responded to this, too, with an initial, “I strongly suggest you don’t go there.” Before I could continue a discussion of why that approach was offensive, the creator brought up having sex with their spouse, then went on a tirade about “uptight” fans and how they’ve always given us the ‘real deal.’ Then they attempted to bait me, with the support of other fans. A recurring theme was likening twitter to “church.”

If “church” is the only place one can avoid objectifying a woman as a sex object then, yes, pretend Twitter is “church.”

It would have been different had there been any other information with the image pointing towards an interaction of a sexual nature. Instead, the image was on its own (I assumed it was stolen from some corner of the internet, and it was definitely uncited) with this gross joke about “inputting” oneself into the woman pictured. If the image alone had been posted, I would have just ignored it. However, the implications of the comment made me decide to speak out.

Now, this is a minor infraction as far as the world of comics fandom goes. I know that. I’m also a little thrilled that my speaking out about a rape culture-induced comment was threatening enough that a major creator subtweeted me several times. Honestly, had it not been for the implication that the creator could come up with no reaction other than “I want to put part of myself in that,” I would have left the incident feeling better about liking the creator and later have forgotten all about it. If it had not been for the ensuing support for the creator’s tantrum and a couple white knights attempting to defend them by claiming my “use of feminism” was “the least appropriate,” I would not have written anything further about it.

I’ve been going round and round in circles, wondering if I am perhaps making a mountain of a mole hill. However, it is the entitlement to female bodies implied in comments like these that breeds the culture that makes walking down the street a noisy and sometimes dangerous affair (Google “street harassment). It is this privilege that make conventions so uncomfortable for women, especially if they cosplay (which I stopped doing years ago). I was taught to treat any task I do in my life, no matter how small, like it is the most important thing. So I’m building some mountains.

I will not allow being ganged up on and a person’s fame silence me. Not this time. I’ve let too many comments like these, online and in person, slide by. I don’t want to keep thinking my silence is helping to poison an industry I used to love.


“King Under the Mountain” Excerpt

I have been a bad blogger! The truth is that I simply have not the time. Several months ago, I quit submitting articles to online publications and covering nerd news, for several reasons.

My time is packed with volunteer work at (now 2!) museums, finishing up my undergrad degree in Art History Criticism & Conservation (with a focus on Asia- specifically China), working in an office that assists the hearing impaired, and pursuing fiction writing. I have begun submitting stories to anthologies and have been working seriously on a novel. I have ideas for more, but as a first complete endeavor, I’m very proud of King Under The Mountain. It has at least a year to go before I attempt to release it, self-published, but I’m proud of the world I have created and love running around in it with my characters.

The book’s setting is split between the spiritually important city of Gray Haven and the city’s charge, Barrowmount, a millenia old burial ground. High King Derwynn Danswinder, the CryptKing of Barrowhill, is the youngest of five children, and the sole surviving member of his immediate family. At 9 years old the title fell to him, and at 12 he must now take up his role as King in Gray Haven while the rest of the kingdom falls apart into civil war around him.

It was important to me that King Under the Mountain include characters of more complex background than the white, heteronormative culture pervasive in fantasy. While the protagonist is indeed white, male, and heterosexual, he is surrounded by a diverse cast of characters that continuously force him to question his role in his own culture, and its place in the future. Ultimately, it is a coming of age story.

The falcons of Danswinder Hall.

I’ve decided to post as excerpt from one of my favorite chapters from the book I’m working on. Enjoy,.. or don’t!


Under the Mountain

An indeterminate amount of time passed. Derwynn felt tired and sore. Suddenly, the Ghoul stopped and crouched. She pulled Derwynn down by the sleeve.

“What-” he was cut off by her hiss. It was a short, silencing sound.

There was a clicking coming from somewhere to their right. He was sure of it. Then it sounded from behind them. She leaned close to him.

“You hear it?”

He nodded.

It switched back and forth from right to rear, never sounding as if it got closer, or farther away. “Never from the left,” she hissed, then nodded her head. He inclined his. “Count to three,” she said, then tamped out the torch. A whirring had begun as he counted in his head. As it crested behind them he turned and ran to the left as fast as he could.

Arms outstretched, he felt wildly for anything in the darkness. Just as his fingers grazed something, it occurred to him that there could be a drop off anywhere. He had never been this deep in the mountain. No one had. Except whatever built this: bjergtrolde or giant.

He found a wall and crouched against it. The Ghoul groped for him in the darkness, and crouched beside him. The whirring got louder, and then there was air pattering against his face. Soft, at first. The force multiplied.

Dozens of little claws and leathery wings and teeth found them. They beat against them, paused, alighting on the pair where they could, then scraped their way upward and elsewhere. At some point, Derwynn found he was screaming. Yelling against the torrent of creatures.

Then it was over. The air left behind fluttered. Soft currents swirled above them. He closed his mouth. The Ghoul heaved breath next to him. The stone was still cold.

Somewhere far away, there was the sound of stone scraping against stone. And then silence.

Excerpt King Under The Mountain

 a novel by Josephine Maria


Codpieces have long been one of the most fascinating things about Renaissance fashion for me. The fact that they were the essential punk fashion during the Renaissance in Europe enchanted me. They have a long and changing history, which makes them that much more interesting!

In case you haven’t guessed, this week’s episode of A Short History was all about the codpiece in armor. As a bonus, I recorded some codpiece facts I didn’t get to use in my video. My favorite fact was one I only discovered while creating this video: There is probably a connection between Syphilis and the use of codpieces! Fascinating. It really put some images in context for me.

Avert thine Eyes!

Avert thine Eyes!


Not today, ladies!

Here are the links to those videos:

A Short History of Fitted Armor: Episode 3

Codpiece Facts

Below are some sources I used on this week’s video. Learn stuff!:

“Codpieces and Syphilis in the Middle Ages” by Diane Evans

“A Brief History of That Most Delectable of Subjects: Codpieces” by Lady Anastasia

“Henry VIII’s Suit of Armor” photo & description by Kyle Handley

Knossos Fieldnotes by C. Michael Hogan

Keep learning!

-BiA Out

Sources & New “A Short History” Episode

The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Helbrunn Timeline of Art History has been an invaluable source for me in private studies, as well as research for projects. This week’s A Short History includes a piece created by the Royal Workshops for Earl George Clifford from the museum’s collection. Many of my videos and online educational projects include pieces from the Met, simply because of the availability of information, and ease of access to images and source information.

The timeline is not limited to armor, by any means. It is actually well-populated in articles on Non-Western art, as well as academic essays on what is generally thought of as “Art History” (Read: White, Male), along with fashion, information on materials, and subjects of art.

A large problem I see in fellow students is not knowing where or how to research when it comes to Art History. First thing, they go to their textbooks, then try a Google search, and are stumped when they’re told that citing unsourced blog articles do not an academic paper make. While I use plenty of these sordid unsourced blog articles and forum posts in online projects, it is only because the information can be found in multiple places, and I feel well-versed enough in the subject to trust the information. I would never use a source like this in an academic paper, and confidence in a source does not make it true.

That being said, the internet is honestly the biggest resource for students, all it takes is a little education. After the plug for my web series, I’m going to share some hints and tips for using the internet as a student. Yes, even Wikipedia.

How to use the internet:

First of all, databases like Jstor are first-rate resources for first and second sources. If you’re a student, it’s extremely likely that your college has access to many databases through your student log in. Talk to your library!

Now the fun stuff:

Google Image Search

One of the biggest problems for creators and photographers that choose to share their work on the internet is the ease with which others steal it. With Google Image search at our finger tips, it’s actually incredibly difficult not to rip someone off, even with honest intentions. There is a clean, honest way to use this tool for research, and it’s something I do every day.

Google an image, or images from the time period you want. Click on its source. Most likely, you’ll find a lot of posts on forums that don’t cite its source, or blog articles that fail to mention anything of academic value about the image in question. If this is the case, that source is useless to you.

If you’re extremely lucky, the image will be watermarked. That makes the searching for information on it easy. Amateur and professional photographers might have watermarked their pics for sites like flickr. In this case, there is an 89% chance it will have its own caption on the original website, or be in an album that has where the images were taken in the title or description. From there, track your images back to the museum or collection they belong to for more information!

In the slightly less lucky case that Google Image Search takes you to the personal blog of someone who cites their sources, a different approach must be taken:

Personal Blogs

Unless you need different viewpoints on what your object was used for, or a source for alternative interpretations of the piece’s meanings, do not cite a blog in your paper. There are a few exceptions, but few is the key word. Instead, look at the caption the blogger put on the image, or read the text of the entry for where the image is from, or who owns the piece. Google that place.

Websites of auction houses, like Sotheby’s, are often where images of objects are lifted. These websites will tell you who the piece sold to, or simply who owned it in the past, plus information on what the object is. Again, tread carefully, because auction houses are trying to sell a piece, and the description is sometimes supplemented by the person trying to sell it. This does not always lead to the most reliable information. Instead, do an internet search for who owned it in the past, the artist, or similar pieces.

In all cases, museum websites are your best bet (next to an essay by the person that dug the thing up/created it/bought it initially). Like the thematic essays put out by the Met on their objects that were discussed above, many museums have information on a lot of their pieces online. Remember to look at similar pieces in a museum’s collection, in case a specific object you want information on is missing.


The scourge of every classroom: Wikipedia’s a collection of the most infamous misinformation on the planet. Armchair historians, internet trolls, pranksters, and the truly ignorant have joined in the unholy act of birthing this monstrous information age baby.

On the other hand, it’s a great resource for the curious, and one of the most worthwhile information sources of extremely specific topics. That being said, Wikipedia should not be used as a source. Instead, it should be used as a means to an end.

Just the other day, I was attempting to hammer down some information on the splitting up of the Frankish kingdoms after the death of Clovis I. After various unsuccessful attempts in the library, I headed over to my old friend Wikipedia to supply some background information on Clovis’ successors. Instead, I found myself correcting the family tree someone supplied (for some reason, people always want to switch the names of husbands and sons). This kind of thing is all too common with a source that is open to public editing.

Instead of citing Wikipedia (which is actually pretty lazy, and lacks the experience of Indiana Jonesing that tough to find info), look at Wikipedia’s sources. Article authors are required to cite each piece of information they enter on a page. This culminates in a library of sources at the bottom of each page- many of which you will find are online, or accessible through the library! EXPLOIT THEIR SOURCES FOR YOUR OWN PURPOSES.

Other Sources

Don’t forget to look at normal sources, too. You know, like books & stuff. Except, look at them online.

The popularity of E-reading means that many sources have been uploaded to the internet. Check Google Books, Kindle, and the websites of journals for printed, scanned material. If you need even more sources, many Google Books have been uploaded in previews, sometimes including the source pages of authors. Plus, running through these previews is a great way to decide what you do and don’t need in your personal research library!

Finally, academic journals offer online versions of their materials. Some of these are only offered online. Jstor is one of the best resources for sorting through the dense, and vast collections of information journal articles have added to scholarship, but many journals have begun offering scanned versions of older issues online for free. Check it out!

That’s all for today. Cite liberally, and research well!

-BiA Out.